The content of this page is copyrighted as it is original content produced by the lawyers at Reardon Law Office LLC (formerly Hassan & Reardon P.C.) in Boston. Please contact us if you would like to use any of this material.
Against this backdrop, a California family sued a physician for allegedly under medicating their father who was dying of lung cancer. In the case of Bergman v. Eden Medical Center, the family of Dr. Bergman sued Dr. Wong Chin for failing to prescribe sufficient pain medication. Mr. Bergman was admitted to the hospital in 1985 suffering from lung cancer and experiencing severe back pain. He remained in the hospital for five days. During his hospitalization, the nurses charted his pain as being between 7 and 10, with 10 being the most extreme pain. The physician's order called for 25 mg of Demerol on a PRN basis. The plaintiff asserted that not only was the amount of medication inadequate but the PRN order meant that the patient had to be in experience significant pain before being administered additional medication.
The family sued on two primary grounds. The first was that he had committed medical malpractice by under medicating. The second was that he had violated the California elder abuse statute. The jury agreed with the family and awarded the family $1.5 million dollars. However, California has a cap on damages for certain medical malpractice claims, and accordingly, the trial judge reduced the award to $250,000. The decision to reduce the award is likely to be appealed. The plaintiff argued that the elder abuse statute allowed for a more extensive award including punitive damages and that the verdict should not have been reduced.
The focus in medication litigation does seem to be shifting toward under medication as a viable cause of action. The difficulty of protecting against this type of claim is two fold: the fear of overmedication allegations and the subjective nature of evaluating pain. Thus, the development of hard and fast guidelines is difficult. However, at a minimum, the JCAHO requirements are an excellent starting point. The adoption of these requirements is important. Once adopted, training physicians and staffs about pain management treatment regimes is imperative. Further, physicians specializing in pain management should be available for consultation. In California, it is reported that the utilization of pain management consults increased dramatically after this jury verdict. Proving that such guidelines were known to the staff and were adhered to in the treatment of a patient should prove to be an extremely effective weapon when defending oneself in lawsuits that allege that a patient suffered unnecessarily from their underlying disease.
Advertising. In accordance with rules established by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. This web site must be labeled "advertising." It is designed to provide general information for clients and friends of the firm and should not be construed as legal advice, or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
© 2012 Reardon Law Office, LLC. Engaged in the general practice of law with an emphasis on health care and employment. Boston Healthcare Law is a trademark of Reardon Law Office, LLC. One International Place, Boston, MA 02110.
75 2nd Ave, Needham, MA 02494
617-859-3600 Attorneys licensed in Massachusetts (MA) and Rhode Island (RI) Reardon Law Office LLC is a professional corporation in Boston, Massachusetts All materials on this website are the property of Reardon Law Office